Under Armour Men's Boxer Jock Performance Boxer Briefs, 2-Pack

First, the positives: very light and breathable materials, good exterior fit. The equipment stays in the ballbag and chafing is prevented if doing less strenuous, upright activities like jogging. Then, the negatives: The equipment keeps falling out of the ballbag if doing anything more varied than jogging - like picking things up off the floor, squatting, or sprinting. I don’t know if this is because of the cut or the fabric. I have boxer briefs from another company with a similar feature and the equipment doesn’t fall out. It does have sturdier fabric. Last, a functional fly would be a beneficial feature in this case. The equipment falls out of the ballbag when I use the restroom which is a hassle. It doesn’t with the competitor’s version, if I use the fly.

Big fan of their fly-less design. Great for workouts, but this is an odd fit.

I had high hopes as a faithful boxer jocks wearer for +15 years. The proportions are off compared to other products and they don’t really meet the goal they were designed for since the space between the pouch and waistband is too long and the pouch does little more than smash things in. The original boxer jocks are still the best, zero notes on those, and still confused why such a great design was discarded.

You have to physically put the boys in there then the fabric causes it to chafe. A complete waste of money.

I realized there was no hole to pee out of after the first large cup of coffee in the morning, who makes underwear with no hole? Compression shorts no hole/ underwear a hole! Normal boxer jocks are a good product.

I assumed UA would get it right since they waited so long to join the popular pouch underwear game, but this was a total flop. The “pouch” has almost no contour and the partition is the thinnest sliver of material with no support, too short and flimsy to separate anything. They deserve two stars only because the materials are excellent as always from UA. This pouch design, however is embarrassing from such an established company.

UA Boxerjocks were my go-to underwear for everyday wear and for activities (hiking, tennis, gym workouts) when I didn't need full-on compression underwear. I got the BallBag version by mistake as part of an in-store exchange. Rather than going back for another exchange, I thought I would just wear them. I was surprised they weren't the gimmick I thought they might be, and actually I liked them better than the Boxerjocks in my rotation. So, I bought six more pair. I haven't owned them long enough to give a longevity report, but they seem to be equally as well made as the non-BallBag version. They wash easily in big loads and small standalone loads.

I’ve been wearing Underarmour boxerjocks for at least 10 years. These are the top of the line so far. I will be buying more!

The ball bag, the headline of these boxer briefs holds everything nicely and for me everything stayed put. The biggest gripes are that it takes too much effort to put everything in place, especially since you have to lift and insert to get it in all in every time you pull them down. This problem would be reduced with a fly.

A good start at a "ball bag" underwear that supports your boys, could be great with these additions: 1. Add a fly - I thought pics show a horizontal one but it's just a seam, not a fly. 2. There is a seam just under your boys and it can chaff - eliminate it. 3. Use materials similar to those in other UA underwear. Specifically ones with micro holes that allow you to breathe. UA could then have a great pair of supportive underwear.